Frag Out! Magazine
Issue link: https://fragout.uberflip.com/i/1467328
DOG RAIL (TOP COVER RAIL ATTACHED IN PLACE OF REAR SIGHT ASSEMBLY) PROS: Lowest possible attachmen for the optics (almost the same level as top cover) Space for optics Optics in the axis of the rifle Folded stocks compatible CONS: Price Difficult to install Optics mounted on the rear of the mount decreases field of view GAS TUBE MOUNT PROS: Easy to install or detach Sight mounted forward improves the speed of aiming and increases field of view CONS: Sight installed forward to the gun changes the balance Some mounts are attached directly to the barrel (decreasing accuracy) Cheap mounts loose zero quickly Temperature and vibration might damage the sights UPPER HANDGUARD MOUNT PROS: Sight mounted forward improves the speed of aiming and increases field of view Compatible with bigger number of sights than the gas tube mount Usually comes in pairs with lower handguard with additional rails/attachment points CONS: Heavier weight has negative effect on the balance of the gun Some mounts are attached directly to the barrel (decreasing accuracy) Picatinny rails on lower handguard may change the grip of supporting hand The main reason for the choice of the mounting solution is our optic. The choice of optics depends on the mission and environment. For urban warfare, I would recommend EOTECH HWS with Dog Leg mount. For use in a CQB environment, the MRDS on the gas tube or instead of rear sight would be my sight to go. For mid and long range, I would go with dovetail mounted rail or some- thing like Sabrewerks KOP System. The choice should be informed. Do not buy cheap stuff. Buy once, cry once. FIREARMS