The scope and results of operations also varied. A certain
number of the undertaken operations brought in tactical
and operational benefits, proving that relatively small ele-
ments using an element of surprise, could be quite painful
for the enemy. For instance, Italian and British naval op-
erations, including raids involving miniature submarines,
could result in damage of battleships, or, as in the case
of the commando operation in St. Nazaire - limit their
operational capabilities within the given area. The SOF
activities also created other benefits. Covert reconnais-
sance made it possible to collect tactical intel for landing
operations, but also, as during Operation Biting, to capture
important enemy equipment (German radar), which made
it possible to implement relevant countermeasures. Inter-
ruption of supplies also resulted in worsening of the situ-
ation at the frontline, while the threat of "behind the lines"
strikes in the relatively safe areas forced the Germans to
use more of their assets there, not at the frontline.
The war's result was however dependent on convention-
al operations, not on SOF. This refers to battles involving
armored divisions and corps, strategic bombing, and the
fight for naval supremacy. As the time went by, it turned
ANALYSIS
